The Northern Gas Gala got underway on 27th November 2013 with forty or so people picketing a small private road called Barton Moss Lane in Salford.
The Lane is very much the edge of town. Next to
Manchester City Airport, on one side is the Manchester, Salford and
Stockport urban conglomeration. On the other it is countryside as far as
Warrington. Historically it has the first canal in Britain, the
Bridgewater, and also the last, the Manchester Ship Canal, and the
railway that runs nearby was once used by Stephenson’s rocket. Now it
was the front line of the new technology of hydraulic fracturing, or
fracking.
Fracking is a form of unconventional oil that is
currently the target of resistance from campaigners around the world.
Their concerns are the air pollution, noise, gas flaring and large
number of lorries associated with a fracking site, large amounts of
water that needs to be brought in and large amounts of waste needing to
be taken out. They fear underground bore holes can crack and methane can
end up where it’s not wanted: in the atmosphere, in the ground water
and in people.
This combination of local and global concerns makes
the anti-fracking movement a diverse one and that was reflected by the
crowd gathered on that first morning. The famous Manchester rain was
absent, but the Greater Manchester Police and was
present in force. A quarter of the mile down the lane the onshore oil
and gas company Igas had built a secure compound in which they were
preparing for a drilling operation to determine whether or not the area
was suitable for fracking.
The police and the campaigners, who styled
themselves the Protectors of Barton Moss, squared off. The police
commander asked politely if the way could be cleared for lorries to get
to the site, and he was politely told that opposition to the work would
be non-violent, but also non-negotiable.
Then the pushing started. Slowly the police moved
the blockade of young and old, men and women down Barton Moss Lane. Some
people pushed harder than others, and soon the first arrests were being
made. It would be difficult to call the atmosphere friendly, but
certainly there was none of the malice and aggression that was later to
characterise the policing. However, if you were arrested by police you
knew about it.
Rob Edwards from Glossop had become the first
arrest of the campaign the previous day. A well built, former rugby
player, he was also an experienced Greenpeace campaigner fully trained
in non-violence who knew how to push ‘passive resistance’ to the limit.
Adamant he did not want to be put in handcuffs, a dozen TAU officers
pushed him face down on the floor and, using pressure points behind his
ear, inflicted sufficient pain to get him to release his hands and let
them cuff him. His bloodied face as he was loaded into the van became
one of the first images of the campaign in the papers.
Two hours after the operation started the convoy of
vehicles was safely in the Igas compound. That
first day set the tone
for the first month of the
campaign: the ‘slow walk’, the pushing and the arrests – a suspiciously
regular five a day. The cue for the latter was usually the ritual
change over from regular police to blue trousered TAU officers about
half way down the lane.
Usually the pace of the walk was set by 82 year old
Anne Power, a local Green Party candidate and formidable campaigner.
She did not move fast enough for GMP and was regularly removed from the
blockade ‘for her own safety’. As a result has Anne has probably now
been arrested more often than any other octogenarian in Manchester.
Anne’s arrests did not endear GMP to the Protectors. Neither did an incident on Friday 13th
December when police plunged into the crowd to make a seemingly random
arrest, propelling a disabled Protector into a ditch in the process and
breaking his leg.
However despite these incidents the daily ‘slow
walks’, which continued through the worst weather of the winter,
developed into a pattern and no matter how many, or how few, arrests
were made, the convoys took about the same length of time to get down
the Lane.
FLAREGATE
Then at the start of January everything changed.
The first the Protectors knew about it was when
someone spotted a report on the Greater Manchester Police Facebook page
of a flare being fired at a GMP helicopter landing at Manchester City
airport. Nobody in camp saw anything and it was assumed this might have
been a New Year’s Eve firework someone had let off a few days late from
one of the nearby estates.
However the police immediately put out a statement
saying the flare had been fired from the camp with the intent of
bringing down the helicopter, with an ominous reference to the fatal
crash in Glasgow the previous November. Two days later the camp was
searched, but no evidence was found. Inquiries in the Brookhouse and
Irlem estates, and an appeal to drivers on the busy A57 that passed the
airport, failed to produce any other witnesses to the flare, but GMP
continued to report that it had been deliberately fired at the
helicopter by the campaigners.
The Protectors had good reason to be unhappy with
GMP after this. Not only were they now being labelled as terrorists, but
the search of the tents had resulted in all their bedding being soaked
in the Manchester rain – not recommended if you are camping in sub-zero
temperatures. However animosity towards the police was usually
restricted to the pages of social media, and on the ‘slow walks’ the
incident was generally regarded as a bad joke.
BACKLASH
However the police continued to repeat the claim
about the flare. They even presented new ‘evidence’, in the form of a
comment on an un-moderated social media page, supposedly by someone from
the campaign, apparently confirming the story. There was no way of
proving who posted this comment, and the wording used strongly suggested
it was not by the person whose name the poster used, but GMP cited this
as further evidence of violence by what they called ‘a minority out to
provoke the police’. Such statements were usually accompanied by
estimates of the cost of the police daily being present on the Lane in
numbers considerably greater than the Protectors.
On the same day as the alleged flare, another
curious incident took place. Barton Moss Lane, which is
clearly signed
as a private road, is also a Public Footpath, but that Saturday a couple
of officers were photographed removing the Public Footpath sign from
the top of the lane. The Rights of Way officer at Stockport Council was
contacted and said he knew nothing about this and that, as far as he was
aware, the lane was still a footpath.
With most of the arrests made being for Obstruction
of the Public Highway, this was a very important point. These charges
would only stand if Barton Moss Lane was indeed a Public Highway. You can't claim legal aid for a defense against this charge, but fortunately local lawyer Simon Pook was will to defend impoverished protectors pro bono. The
courts, which had been taking an increasingly dim view of GMP tactics,
and which were regularly releasing campaigners on unconditional bail
even if they had been arrested for breach of bail conditions, would be able
to decide.
LEGALLY DUBIOUS
As January 2014 came to an end there was still no
ruling, but Greater Manchester Police may have started to sense which
way the legal wind was blowing. Although there were still plenty of
complaints of police violence, arrested campaigners were sometimes just
led away rather than wrestled to the floor and handcuffed and on 30th
January the police stayed in their vans and let the Protectors walk the
lorries down unescorted. As usual the convoy took two hours to get to
the Igas site.
Then on Wednesday 12th February, Judge
Khalid Qureshi, in Manchester Magistrates Court, ruled that the Lane
was a Private Road and Public Footpath and not a Public Highway. By this
time the number of people arrested was well over a hundred and the
prospect was that most would now have their charges dropped. It looked
like Greater Manchester Police had just arrested a hundred innocent
people, and spent nearly a million pounds, policing a peaceful protest
that could have been handled by a village bobby on his bike.
For
two days after the ruling nothing happened. No convoy passed down the
lane and no-one was arrested. Then the police returned with a violence
seemingly fortified, and not mollified, by the collapse of their legal
case. They started arresting the Protectors once more, hospitalising
Vanda Gillett in the process.
Vanda had been pushed in the back by an officer,
one of the many minor acts of provocation that now
occurred on a daily
basis. Others included punches in the ribs when no-one was looking,
threats to “see you later” and boasts about how much overtime pay the
officers were receiving. Vanda instinctively replied with a coarse word
and was immediate handcuffed and dragged away, her hands almost being
pulled backwards over her head in the process. She was left on the
ground twitching and apparently fitting.
An ambulance was called, but was not allowed down
the lane for nearly half an hour. Supporters of the camp coming to the
site after seeing the incident on Facebook found
uniformed officers stopping them at the top of Barton Moss Lane and
claiming the area was a ‘crime scene’. Vanda, a mother of five,
eventually made it to hospital where she discovered she was no longer
under arrest and that, although she had not had a fit, the violence of
her arrest had trapped a nerve.
TRESPASS ON A PUBLIC FOOTPATH
The increase in the level of aggression by the TAU
was not the only surprise for the campaign. The police were now making
arrests for the crime of Aggravated Trespass. This offence, from the
notorious 1994 Criminal Justice and Public Order Bill, has been widely
used against environmental protesters in the past. However the bill
clearly defined trespass as only being possible on land to which the
public did not have access. As Judge Quereshi had clearly ruled Barton
Moss Lane was a Public Footpath, this charge required the police to
claim that the Igas lorries, or themselves, somehow had priority over
pedestrians on the footpath, a feat of legal legerdemain that has no
precedent.
So that is the current state of play at Barton
Moss: the law seemingly on the side of the Protectors, the Law clearly
siding with Igas, and the convoys still taking two hours to get down the
Lane.
The number of people camping on Barton Moss is
small, but they are only there because of the support from the local
community. Greater Manchester Police meanwhile continue to act as if the
campers are their personal enemies. Conspicuously absent during rallies
and media visits, they often arrive just minutes later to carry out
more seemingly random arrests. From the use of Aggravated Trespass on a
Public Footpath, to the man arrested for drink driving whilst sober and
on foot, they act seemingly independent of the law.
The very serious concern for the local campaigners
is that violent protests will attract violent protesters. So far this
has not happened, and the Protectors are still committed to peaceful
civil disobedience. However this is despite, and not because of, the
actions of Greater Manchester Police.